Euro 2020 will be hosted by Europe. The whole continent.

Road trip, anyone? UEFA announced that the 2020 European Championship tournament will be held in a number of cities across the continent. This means that for the first time ever there will be no country “hosting” the tournament, per se. Euro 2020 will be spread across the whole of Europe, all ~4 million square miles of it.

Reportedly, the 13 possible host cities are Istanbul, London, Paris, Madrid, Rome, Berlin, Athens, Moscow, Kiev, Amsterdam, Brussels, Basel, Zagreb. Fans who want to travel with their team, get used to searching for cheap flights and trains. For casual fans who don’t mind paying an exhorbitant amount to watch a match and jaunter around a European capital for a few days, enjoy.

Our own Saf Hossain addressed this very idea back in July. In his words:

"The logic behind having a tournament in several major cities is that a city like Rome or Madrid will already have the necessary infrastructure in place. This removes the burden building several new stadiums and infrastructure projects off the shoulders of the host country – remember, Europe’s financial position is precarious at best. As in Russia, the largest country ever be awarded the FIFA World Cup, teams would be assigned to clusters of nearby cities (.e.g. Berlin and Prague). A tournament staged in this way could even allow for fans to see cities such as Budapest and Zagreb, which wouldn’t usually get a sniff for hosting duties.

But what about the fans – will it still be possible to follow their team all across Europe? You can almost feel the gallic shrug as Mr Platini simply says, “there are budget airlines”, as if he’s telling you and I to ‘deal with it’.”

Is this a disgrace to football and another example that the men who run football care about money more than anything else? Or are you intrigued by the idea and welcome the change in the tournament’s structure? While we look into book an old VW Eurovan, let us know your thoughts.

  1. barcmar reblogged this from fabjohnson
  2. footballers-headband reblogged this from goretzkas
  3. fabjohnson reblogged this from bastianswagsteiger
  4. goretzkas reblogged this from bastianswagsteiger
  5. bastianswagsteiger reblogged this from afootballreport
  6. rsiisports reblogged this from afootballreport
  7. furrybrofist reblogged this from afootballreport
  8. kelsyrios reblogged this from afootballreport
  9. immoralmacchiatos reblogged this from afootballreport
  10. keep-calm-and-smoke-like-marley reblogged this from afootballreport
  11. jlaw-mangala reblogged this from afootballreport
  12. edgarlai reblogged this from afootballreport
  13. geoffchaucer reblogged this from afootballreport
  14. onedayinnovember reblogged this from afootballreport
  15. lionheart-07 reblogged this from afootballreport
  16. itskennnnnn reblogged this from afootballreport
  17. azureskiess reblogged this from afootballreport
  18. fifaworldwar reblogged this from vamos-por-todo and added:
    Is this for real?
  19. vamos-por-todo reblogged this from doux-amer
  20. doux-amer reblogged this from inventfootball and added:
    Ugh, why?! We’ve all discussed why this isn’t a good idea for the teams and the fans. That being said, those who have...
  21. daviidlucaas reblogged this from afootballreport
  22. kadirgazioglu reblogged this from afootballreport
  23. v-alotelli answered: I’m against this. it’s a waste of money.
  24. stephvang reblogged this from afootballreport
  25. markentus reblogged this from afootballreport
  26. teaandsarcasm answered: No regard for cost, air miles, the community a tournament can affect. -Can see their appeal, just looks horribly out of touch. Its ridiculous
  27. myrieta reblogged this from afootballreport
blog comments powered by Disqus